I thought that was an April Fools' joke at first......

Or is it?

I guess I've seen weirder things.

rock harris
programming god, tyro woodworker, and aficionado of obsolete machinery
314.221.5941

Sent from my BatPhone....

> On Oct 22, 2014, at 09:40, Maddex, Peter  wrote:
> 
> How about...
> 
> http://www.lee
valley.com/us/wood/page.aspx?p=62708&c=
> 
> ;-)
> 
> Pete
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oldtools-bounces@r... [mailto
:oldtools-bounces@r...] On Behalf Of Phil Schempf
> Sent: 22 October 2014 15:36
> To: Malcolm Thomas
> Cc: oldtools@r...
> Subject: Re: [OldTools] advice on finger joints?
> 
> Mal-
> 
> Your query aroused my curiosity about finger/box joints (I've always thought
of finger joints as those joining lengths of wood as putting your fingers
together parallel and a box joints as those joining at 90°).  As Mike points
out, box joints were used as a quick way to make a box with machines, no
surprise there, but that type of joint has existed for much longer than tailed
tools have been around, assuming you believe what is written on the internet.
Somewhere I found one reference that such joints were used by the Egyptians.
> 
> If I was to set about doing such a joint by hand I would approach it the same
way I would a dovetail, lay out a base line and mark out the "tails and pins".
A hand cut box joint wouldn't need to be regular as a machine cut joint
typically is; the tails and pins could be random widths, but I'm guessing you
want to replicate the machine look so I'd set off the widths with a divider to
the desire dimension.  Pare/saw out the waste.  I think I'd still use the first
cut board to lay out the second so the fingers fit any irregularities resulting
from the handwork.  Glue them up and trim the finger tips you intentionally left
a tad long.
> 
> I started into this thinking cutting a box joint would be easier to do by hand
than dovetails, but now I'm having doubts.  A box joint to replicate a machine
cut one needs a high degree of precision and uniformity, something machines are
pretty good at.  Creating that uniformity may be a greater challenge than
creating the hand cut look of dovetails that so many prize.
> I'll be interested to hear your thoughts after you've gone down this path.
> 
> Phil
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> OldTools is a mailing list catering to the interests of hand tool aficionados,
both collectors and users, to discuss the history, usage, value, location,
availability, collectibility, and restoration of traditional handtools,
especially woodworking tools.
> 
> To change your subscription options:
> http://rucku
s.law.cornell.edu/mailman/listinfo/oldtools
> 
> To read the FAQ:
> http://swingleydev.com/archi
ve/faq.html
> 
> OldTools archive: http://swingleydev.com/archive/">http://swingleydev.com/archive/
> 
> OldTools@r...
> http://rucku
s.law.cornell.edu/mailman/listinfo/oldtools
> DISCLAIMER: This email is intended solely for the addressee. It may contain
private and confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee,
please take no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. In this case,
please reply to this email to highlight the error. Opinions and information in
this email that do not relate to the official business of Nottingham Trent
University shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the University.
Nottingham Trent University has taken steps to ensure that this email and any
attachments are virus-free, but we do advise that the recipient should check
that the email and its attachments are actually virus free. This is in keeping
with good computing practice.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> OldTools is a mailing list catering to the interests of hand tool
> aficionados, both collectors and users, to discuss the history, usage,
> value, location, availability, collectibility, and restoration of
> traditional handtools, especially woodworking tools.
> 
> To change your subscription options:
> http://rucku
s.law.cornell.edu/mailman/listinfo/oldtools
> 
> To read the FAQ:
> http://swingleydev.com/archi
ve/faq.html
> 
> OldTools archive: http://swingleydev.com/archive/">http://swingleydev.com/archive/
> 
> OldTools@r...
> http://rucku
s.law.cornell.edu/mailman/listinfo/oldtools