OldTools Archive
Recent | Bios | FAQ |
144605 | Jack Kamishlian <kamishlian@g...> | 2005‑04‑12 | Stropping |
GGs, It seems when I strop an iron using a leather strop, it appears that I'm dubbing the edge. Instead, I've used a flat piece of pine and rubbed it with that green stuff - chromium oxide honing compound- and I seem to do a lot better. Is the leather strop better than the method I'm using? If so, what am I doing wrong? Cheers, and thanks in advance, Jack in Endwell, NY ______________________________________________________________ |
|||
144628 | "Charles Aoun" <sharpblade@v...> | 2005‑04‑13 | Re: Stropping |
Jack asks about why he may be dubbing the edge using a leather strop... Not seeing your technique, this is just a guess. Could it be that the curvature or belly that you have in your leather strop (belt?) creating this. Try glueing the leather to a firm/flat surface similar to the way you used the piece of pine, and use the smooth side of the leather. YMMV... charles, North of Boston. woke up to new frost this morning, after digging out my shorts and T's last weekend. ______________________________________________________________ |
|||
144643 | Thomas Conroy <booktoolcutter@y...> | 2005‑04‑13 | Re: Stropping |
>Jack asks about why he may be dubbing the edge using a leather strop...< "Leather" is a group of materials with very diverse properties. It may be very hard and firm or very soft. If you use a soft strop, or (as Charles said) don't have it glued down dead flat, it will tend to round over the edge. And "soft" here is a range: most leathers that you come across from miscellaneous sources will be quite soft for this purpose. Even veg-tanned thick steerhide, my preferred strop material, is softer than pine; sole leather is very hard, but perhaps too hard. Most random-source leather is chrome tanned, and in my opinion far too soft for strops. This is one reason I dislike the any-old-scrap-will-do approach (the other is that worn leather from odd sources may well have embedded grit or dirt that will injure the edge--- it does not take much, and you might not notice the effect). There are two stages in stropping as I was taught it. Both are polishing, not metal-removal, steps. As a friend was told by her jewelery teacher: "there are compounds for moving metal, and compounds for removing metal". Polishing just moves the metal around. The first part of stropping uses jewelers' rouge or some other polishing compound on a carrier. The carrier may be very hard, like an endgrain wood block, in which case you must hold the bevel at exactly the right angle to get the right effect. It may be slightly soft, like cardboard or flsh-side (rough-side) sole leather. Sole leather goes through a pounding step to compress it, and may be filled with waxes or other compoounds. Hard vegetable-tanned steerhide, the material that weightlifters' or tool belts are usually made of, is soft enough that it will give a bit under the edge and you need not be quite so precise in the angle you hone at--- the downside is that it may round over the edge just a hair. Anything softer will round over the edge perceptibly and will cause problems. The second step in stropping as I was taught it is using the hair (smooth) side of leather without compound. Without this step leatherworking knives will not cut sweetly. Most of what I said about the softness of leather as a carrier for rouge goes here too, but a bit more illumination can be added. Instead of using leather for the final polishing, you can use a steel-- a highly polished steel rod. This must, like a wood compound-carrier, be used at exactly the right angle, so it is not user friendly, but it moves the metal surface around without removing any of it. Steels were favored by meat cutters and butchers, and it is my belief that this was because a leather strop would absorb body fluids and go rancid, while a steel could be kept clean. If stropping on leather does round over your edge and on wood doesn't then probably your hand is doing the right thing (unless you aren't getting the edge down onto the wood at all). In this case try a strop made of harder leather. Shoemakers' suppliers will usually sell a strip of sole leather about four inches wide; this is intended for two shoe soles, and is just right for a strop.And make sure the wood you glue it down to is flat, and that it is quarter-cut so that it stays flat. Tom Conroy Berkeley __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ ______________________________________________________________ |
|||
144646 | gary may <garyallanmay@y...> | 2005‑04‑13 | Re: Stropping |
Great post Tom! It doesn't get any better than this one----I do have to make one point on steels--- --- Thomas Conroy |
|||
144618 | "Derek Cohen" <derekcohen@i...> | 2005‑04‑13 | re: Stropping |
Jack Kamishlian wrote: "It seems when I strop an iron using a leather strop, it appears that I'm dubbing the edge. Instead, I've used a flat piece of pine and rubbed it with that green stuff - chromium oxide honing compound-and I seem to do a lot better. Is the leather strop better than the method I'm using? If so, what am I doing wrong?" Jack, I strop in one of two ways. The first is similar to you own, that is, I use the Veritas green rouge rubbed on MDF (Medium Density Fibreboard, Jeff). I find that the MDF is flat, hard, and yet porous enough to hold the rouge. I always keep a 6"x 6" square handy. The other method is best said in a whisper here, that is, I have a powered Honing Plate" on a large belt sander that I modified for use in grinding blades. The honing plate uses two sanding disks glued front-to-front and attached with velcro. Veritas green rouge is applied to the outer velcro surface. OK, I should not feel so guilty about mentioning it here. Brent Beach has plugged it on his website and there is enough talk of powered grinders thrown around. My main interest is hand tooling and this is aimed at the restoration end of blades (my sharpening is done on waterstones). But it works damn well and anyone thinking of a powered bench grinder should look at a belt sander instead. Picture of belt sander: http://www.woodworkforums.ubeaut.com.au/attachment.php?attachmentid Picture of Honing Plate: http://www.woodworkforums.ubeaut.com.au/attachment.php?attachmentid Now my main reason for replying to this topic was to discuss the whole idea of stropping. Brent has some rather negative things to say on his website, and his evidence is strong. See: http://www3.telus.net/BrentBeach/Stropping/Stropping.html In a recent email conversation with Brent, he made the following points, which I shall share with all (since I am sure that he would welcome further discussion): Derek: Firstly, if I understand you correctly, you are saying that all honing degrades the sharpened edge. If so, why is it that the Veritas green rouge seems to make a positive difference in practise? And why is it able to remove scratches from a 6000 grit waterstone? What grit is the Veritas green? Brent: I have added a conclusion section to the stropping page (not honing, a term I reserve for the use of fine abrasives on micro bevels). I don't know why many people report improved results with stropping. There are two likely answers. First, they are starting with bevels that are much worse than mine. I have done tests where I stop after the 5 micron abrasive and the blades work, just not as well. Certainly if you go to 0.5 micron 3M microfinishing abrasives then stropping is a mistake. Second, perhaps done in a different way - saw on leather or using a powered wheel - the results are different. It would be interesting to put a few blades under the microscope - say one blade pre-stropping and a second comparable blade post stropping - and see what the difference is. To do this I would have to replicate a happy stropper's setup and practise, or ship blades back and forth. Removing scratches is a different problem. What you see - with the naked eye I presume - when you think scratches are being removed is not necessarily that. It could simply be a different kind of scratch. The 6000 grit stone may contain a variety of grit sizes - most do, even artificial. The larger bits might be putting a scratch on the bevel that you see as scratches, while all the small bits are putting on smaller scratches which you don't see. The strop may be changing the scratch size distribution in a way that looks like the scratches are gone. Even with the microscope, the 0.5 micron bevels still have scratches. However, they are fine enough that visible light is not reflected in a way that makes them visible. Derek: Secondly, is there a paste/rouge/other that I can use on my Honing Plate that will enhance the honing process (diamond? If so, in what medium?) Brent: I have read that there are green crayons - CrO - that are almost pure CrO. Lee Valley, at least back when I bought mine, was a mixture to improve cutting speed. The pure CrO will be slower and should only be used on a micro bevel to get reasonable honing time. I don't know who makes or sells the purer kinds. Diamonds are fast, but test done by others and viewed under a microscope show the same spread of grit sizes and scratch sizes (again, not all 0.5 micron diamond pastes, but those tested). Some suggest that diamond is too hard for edge tools. Where softer abrasives split, diamond fractures the edge more deeply. Again, powered strops or different strop material may make a difference. The bottom line for me is that I don't think strops work, but they might. What I know does work is 3M microfinishing abrasives. I am testing some oil stones these days and I will know something about them in the next few months. I have some diamond paste and will try it in the next month or so. |
|||
144654 | Ron Hock <ron@h...> | 2005‑04‑13 | Re: Stropping |
> Among chefs much is made of the magnetic properties of the > steel---most of the good steels are magnetized---and how this > magnetism aligns the domains of the molecules in the edge to lengthen > its life---like cryogenics (and prayer) it can't hurt, but the steel > itself whether "highly polished" (which is rare in my experience) or > ridged a little like a file (which is common, IME) basically > cold-forges a sharp and somewhat durable edge. I think the longitudinal file-like ridges act more like file teeth and the magnetism is there to keep the filings from falling onto your turkey. I keep our kitchen knives sharp with a smooth steel -- they haven't been abraded in years. Try your burnisher in the kitchen -- you'll love it. (And you can sharpen scissors, too, with it. Just close the scissors on the burnisher like you were trying to cut it in two. Run the rod up and down the length of the blades. Works.) The Rev. -- Ron Hock HOCK TOOLS http://www.hocktools.com 16650 Mitchell Creek Dr Fort Bragg, CA 95437 (707) 964-2782 fax (707) 964-7816 ______________________________________________________________ |
|||
144671 | "Jeff Gorman" <amgron@c...> | 2005‑04‑14 | RE: Stropping |
: -----Original Message----- : From: Jack Kamishlian [mailto:kamishlian@g...] : Sent: 13 April 2005 00:05 : To: oldtools : Subject: [oldtools] Stropping : It seems when I strop an iron using a leather strop, it appears that : I'm dubbing the edge. Instead, I've used a flat piece of pine and : rubbed it with that green stuff - chromium oxide honing compound- : and I seem to do a lot better. Is the leather strop better than the : method I'm using? If so, what am I doing wrong? Not exactly wrong, but is is really necessary to strop an 'iron' (ie a plane iron. Under planing conditions, many repetitions at speed against much resistance will soon break down a fastidiously sharpened edge. Stropping is perhaps best kept for carving tools (and bookbinders tools of course)? For microbevel sharpening using chromium polish on a glass plate people might like to look at my web site - Sharpening Notes - Some Scientific Light on Sharpening Technique. Jeff -- Jeff Gorman, West Yorkshire, UK www.amgron.clara.net ______________________________________________________________ |
|||
Recent | Bios | FAQ |