Some snippage from this exchange - as per FAQ.
Did anyone else notice that subtle delay excuse being built in? *
> On 18 Sep 2018, at 22:17, Kirk Eppler wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 1:46 PM John Ruth wrote:
>
>> 50 years...he, he, he. Galoot timeline for sure!
>>
>> Is that QS Oak box the right size to contain a Stanley 45 or 55
>> multiplane? If so, there's your use for it.
>>
> John
>
> Thanks for the kind words.
>
> I haven't sized the box yet. Since I don't have a 45 or 55, and my 1080
> has a factory box, I need to think downsize to the 50, or maybe the woodie
> multi blade plane. Counting back 55 years to figure out what's appropriate
> doesn't give me great tool choices, so I will assume he used something more
> vintage than the router or shaper to build it.
> --
> Kirk Eppler, who discovered a pile of tool pictures that got neglected over
> the past year, and caught up a bit over lunch
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
In case you missed it - here it is.
> Since I don't have a 45 or 55, and
Kirk will HAVE to wait until he lays hands on a 45 or 55 before he can work on
the box. Not just ANY 45 of course - the right one - carefully searched for,
evaluated, a couple of missing parts located, and then finally he’ll be able to
lay out the 45 and say ‘This is never going to fit that box - better get a 55’
Richard Wilson
Northumbrian galoot, where the first of the new seasons gales has hit.
(Does having steel and castings and infill timber for planes fit the criteria
for ‘delayed projects’ ? )
|