OldTools Archive
Recent | Bios | FAQ |
25235 | <Dnbyr@A...> | 1997‑08‑31 | Skew Angle for 46 Cutters |
Couple of weeks back, Thomas McCluskey inquired about the proper skew angle of cutters for the Stanley 46 plane, to which Patrick Leach replied: >> 25 degrees +/- an angstrom or two. There are several angles involved on a 46, and I wasn't exactly sure which one Thomas was asking about, so I decided to pull out a couple of 46's and my trusty Starrett adjustable protractor to see for myself. Having made cutters for 46's, I'd dont this before, but I couldn't find my notes. Here's what I measure: The skew of the blade: assuming this means the angle at which the blade sits in the plane referenced to the side of the plane which is parallel to the direction the plane moves in use, this angle is 60 degrees, or 30 degrees deviation from the 90 degrees at which most plane blades rest referenced to the plane side. The pitch of the blade, or the angle at which it sits in the plane referenced to horizontal, is 61 degrees (as opposed to 45 degrees which is common for bench planes and molding planes). Most plane blades have a cutting edge which is 90 degrees to the edges of the blade. On a 46, the cutter edge angle is 71 degrees/109 degrees (depending on which edge you measure from). The long edge of the blade is beveled to 110 degrees from the cutting face of the blade to provide the necessary relief. The short edge of the blade is beveled to 70 degrees from the cutting face to provide support for the cutting edge but with relief also. Note that if the blade were mounted in the plane square instead of skewed, the back of this edge would actually protrude further to the left than the cutting edge. I haven't been able to figure out which angle Patrick measured at 25 degrees. There is very slight deviation between my c. 1880's 46 and my c. 1920 model. I'm sure my terminology and descriptions are confusing, but I look forward to further discussion. Don Boyer |
|||
25246 | Thomas E. McCluskey <tmcclus@j...> | 1997‑08‑31 | Re: Skew Angle for 46 Cutters |
On Sun, 31 Aug 1997 16:16:19 -0400 (EDT) Dnbyr@a... writes: >Couple of weeks back, Thomas McCluskey inquired about the proper skew >angle >of cutters for the Stanley 46 plane, to which Patrick Leach replied: > >>> 25 degrees +/- an angstrom or two. > >snip all the measuring stuff. Thanks for the response Chock it up to newbie lack of vocabulary. I reasoned that the angle/angles that the cutter clamps into the plane is fixed. ( I can't change it) The only angles I control as someone who wants to sharpen his blades accurately, is the bevel angle (the primary angle of the cutting edge in relation to the flat part of the blade) and the skew angle (the angle of the the cutting edge in relation to the sides.) On a typical plane blade the "standard" bevel is 25 degrees. The "standard" skew is 90 degrees ( or maybe 0 degrees) (BTW I am trying to indicate my understanding whether correct or incorrect by use of parentheses) Based on the input from the group, the skew on the #46 cutter is 68 to 71 degrees. BTW what was the variance on your 1880s vs. 1920s?. The reason I ask is my plane is from the 20s and the cutters wers purchased separately and are older. Anyone have good definitions for the various blade angles we've discussed? (Newbie has inquiring mind and needs to know to prevent future faux pas.) |
|||
25259 | David Hunkins <drhunk@c...> | 1997‑09‑01 | Re: Skew Angle for 46 Cutters |
At 10:45 PM 8/31/97 EDT, Thomas E. McCluskey wrote: > >On Sun, 31 Aug 1997 16:16:19 -0400 (EDT) Dnbyr@a... writes: >>Couple of weeks back, Thomas McCluskey inquired about the proper skew >>angle >>of cutters for the Stanley 46 plane, to which Patrick Leach replied: >> >>>> 25 degrees +/- an angstrom or two. >> >>snip all the measuring stuff. > >Thanks for the response > >Chock it up to newbie lack of vocabulary. > > I reasoned that the angle/angles that the cutter clamps into the plane >is fixed. ( I can't change it) The only angles I control as someone who >wants to sharpen his blades accurately, is the bevel angle (the primary >angle of the cutting edge in relation to the flat part of the blade) and >the skew angle (the angle of the the cutting edge in relation to the >sides.) On a typical plane blade the "standard" bevel is 25 degrees. >The "standard" skew is 90 degrees ( or maybe 0 degrees) > >(BTW I am trying to indicate my understanding whether correct or >incorrect by use of parentheses) > >Based on the input from the group, the skew on the #46 cutter is 68 to 71 >degrees. > >BTW what was the variance on your 1880s vs. 1920s?. The reason I ask is >my plane is from the 20s and the cutters wers purchased separately and >are older. Tom, I made access and unpacked the box containing my No.46 this weekend and took a measurement. Same as previously reported, I think by Ernie, at near 68.5 degrees. This is from original boxed blades that came with an early Type 5 (1884-85) according to the Roger Smith study in the latest Walter. Hope this helps more than my previously flippant reply which suggested measuring, etc. David |
|||
25290 | Brent Parkin <parkinb@w...> | 1997‑09‑01 | Re: Skew Angle for 46 Cutters |
Or of course you can all wait until Ron and I put the drawings for all the No.46 cutters up on his site :). Regards, -------------------------------------------------- Brent Parkin Toronto, Ontario Canada eh! |
|||
25361 | Ernie Fisch <ernfisch@p...> | 1997‑09‑01 | Re: Skew Angle for 46 Cutters |
** Reply to note from tmcclus@j... Sun, 31 Aug 1997 22:45:29 EDT GGs, A skewed blade has three angles of interest. The skew angle, the beddinga angle and the bevel angle. My definitions of these angles are as follows: Skew angle: The angle between 90 deg to the side of the plane and the back of the mouth. Skew is the angle the blade is moved from normal, which is 90 deg. This angle is measured on the sole of the plane. Bedding angle: This is the angle between the sole of the plane and the iron. Typically 45 deg. Bevel angle: The angle of the bevel measured at 90 deg to the edge. The skew angle is NOT the same as the skew on the edge of the blade due to the effect of the bedding angle. If the edge of the blade is parallel to the back of the mouth you can use the blade as a reference and just measure the angle from the blade (record it somewhere safe). Otherwise it can be developed geometrically from the skew and bedding angles. Or just believe us. In practice the blade can be fiddled with slightly to make small changes in the skew angle when it is mounted in the plane. Ernie I'm not a collector, really. I'm just a user without enough time. (used by permission) |
|||
25380 | <Dnbyr@A...> | 1997‑09‑02 | Re: Skew Angle for 46 Cutters |
In a message dated 97-09-01 22:27:13 EDT, Ernie writes: << A skewed blade has three angles of interest. The skew angle, the beddinga angle and the bevel angle. >> To which I must add, the relief angle of the right edge and the anti-relief angle of the left edge, which as I've already noted, are different on 46 cutters. I defined the relief angle as that angle defined by the flat cutting surface of the blade (the surface facing the front of the plane in use as opposed to the beveled surface) and either side edge of the blade, as measured 90 degrees to the edge. As I noted earlier, without the proper relief angle, the trailing edge of the blade would drag in the groove cut by the plane, or if too much relief were provided, the cutting edge might have insufficient support at that edge. Ernie seems to have a great handle on wording these things, so perhaps he can take a stab at clarifying what I've just tried to say. Thanks for the great input, Ernie. Don |
|||
25547 | Thomas E. McCluskey <tmcclus@j...> | 1997‑09‑04 | Re: Skew Angle for 46 Cutters |
On Mon, 1 Sep 1997 08:11:35 -0400 (EDT) Brent Parkin parkinb@w... writes: >Or of course you can all wait until Ron and I put the drawings for all >the >No.46 cutters up on his site :). > >Regards, > >-------------------------------------------------- >Brent Parkin > >Toronto, Ontario >Canada eh! > Brent Still waiting. Give me a post when you are up and I'll go get on the 'Net at the library. I'm cheap. I'd rather spend my money on tools than on computers. Tom |
|||
Recent | Bios | FAQ |