Last Saturday saw me making a short tour of one of my favourite
flea-markets, the first in quite a while.
Nothing much on offer, but catching up with some of my favourite
fleasters made it all worth while. Breath-taking tales from the
honey-man, describing his moonlit flights from officialdom through many
miles over the ridges and gullies of the trackless sclerophyll forests
with hundreds of hives in tow, the enforcers of the "Apiaries Act 1982",
intent that he should be "brought up to date" and made to pay the
Government for the keeping of his bees, in uncomfortable and futile
pursuit. His stories made the epic drives of the brothers Kennif and
other leading cattle thieves of our not-so-early days look like
Sunday-school picnics.
However, from the man who has cornered the market in second-hand
irrigation pumps I acquired for $8.00 without demur on my part that
which seemed to be a very common representative of the coffin-smoother
clan, the only "unusual" thing immediately obvious about it being that
it seemed in really good, clean, barely-used condition with a bit of
superficial rust on the irons and a bit of dust on the woodwork but with
a sole showing little signs of use. I'll not offer to play at the
question of whether I needed another coffin-smoother and it may go
through to the wicket-keeper.
The plane was 8" long and got out of a piece of 3" x 3" beech, all very
standard for a coffin-smoother made in the U.K. However, disassembly
and a little rust removal showed that the little-used iron was
inscribed, in three lines, "AHREM'S", "Goodline" and "Germany" and the
only readily discernable marking on the plane's body was " 2" " on its
heel. Being ever ready to jump to unsupported conclusions, I opined
that I was dealing with a plane body manufactured in the U.K. and
bearing a replacement iron from Germany. Use of a hand-lens disclosed
no maker's mark or name on the toe of the plane and, simply as bit of
an after-thought, I inspected the plane's heel through the lens. There,
under the " 2" " mark, I discerned the name "AHREM'S".
This surprised me as I had already divided the world of wooden smoothing
planes into those of European pattern made in one or other of the
nations of Europe as they evolve or dissolve and those of U.K. pattern,
the coffin-smoothers, made in the U.K., with the colonies tasking their
leads in plane fashions from, necessarily, the most recently successful
of their colonisers.
A small design feature of the double-irons set-up is new to me. Instead
of the traditional "lump" on the back of the cap-iron into which the
holding screw threads and which necessitates an accommodating groove in
the underside of the wedge, there is spot-welded to the underside of the
cap-iron, a flat piece with parallel, straight sides and semi-circular
ends (geometric name?) and with a threaded hole. This piece makes a
fairly precise fit with the slot in the cutting iron and extends a
poofteenth beyond the thickness of the tapered cutting iron to be
accommodated, in any event, in the slot cut in the bed for the holding
screw's head. This piece assists, to some extent, with the squaring of
the cap-iron to the cutter.
The cutter is tapered in its thickness throughout its length although it
seems to be made of modern, high-carbon steel.
My absolutely unsupported hypothesis as to why the cutting iron on a
double-ironed plane is tapered is that the firming into place of the
cap-iron tends to distort the cutting iron and that this distortion is
minimised towards the cutting edge where the iron is thicker and
therefore more resistant to the distorting forces of the screw. Not much
of an hypothesis, I admit, in circumstances where the distortion
problem could more reliably be solved by making the whole cutting iron
thicker to start with.
I am now left to puzzle as to whether a German manufacturer made some of
its tools solely for markets in or influenced in its preferences by the
U.K. or whether coffin-smoothers had gained some sort of acceptance
amongst European workers. I remember other examples of Ahrem's
"Goodline" tools being available here but they were, as far as I can
recall, setting-out tools of somewhat universal pattern and without
distinctive, regional peculiarities.
Regards from Brisbane,
John Manners
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|