OldTools Archive

Recent Bios FAQ

272603 John Ruth <johnrruth@h...> 2021‑01‑18 Re: Cowell and Chapman dilemma
Bill,

I'm sure you already found this page, which reproduces an advert giving a
31-DEC-1889 end date for Cowell & Chapman:

https://www.lumberjocks.com/Brit/blog/28488

Your plane is "better" than the David Stanley example in respect to the fence
adjustment.
The fine-pitch brass screws and beautifully rope-knurled nuts on your plane are
more practical and offer finer adjustment than the wooden threaded parts of the
David Stanley example.  Brass is a more "certain" manufacturing material than
wood; there's no fragile grain and less likelihood of a hidden internal flaw
ruining a partially-finished piece.

The whole design could possibly be reproduced with modern techniques and
materials for the "bespoke" market, a la Karl Hotley.  The body could be "hogged
out" of solid material or built up from pieces like as is done on an infill
plane made from brass plates.

John Ruth




Sent from my iPhones

Recent Bios FAQ