The following shows the message you requested. To get back to the list of browse results, click the back button on your browser.
If you are thinking of subscribing to this list, please consult the OldTools FAQ.
| 63776 | Eric Coyle <ecoyle@c...> | Jun-10-1999 | The inclined plane.... |
fella GG's....... I'm reading about this inclined plane stuff and shaking my head. It reminds me of the little article in FHB years ago that precursed the SS sharpening methodology. (that was about the mexican carpenter who always had the shrapest tools, yet was never seen sharpening them. Investigation revealed that he was sharpening them on sandpaper, unlike the rest of the carpenters who had spent megabucks on the latest and greatest sharpening systems....) To my mind, only an anal rentitive obsessive complulsive could dream up a goal/scenario about planes sliding down inclined boards, generating gossamer shavings as they go.. When it happens (accidentally) round here, the plane normally hits the floor, breaks off a cheek or two, cracks or does some other damage. Toolgod, I wish I had time to attempt this kinda stuff, but I'm more concerned about dropping my 4" slick on my toes......(I wonder if WCB will cover that???) Personally, I would wonder about a shikonun who would hone the iron after each pass. Musta been paid by the hour. Honestly, there is a lot of Hokey Crap (HC) that circulates in the name of WW lore/legend/urbane mythology (WWLLUM). This kinda stuff has gotta rank right up there- ain't nothin like dogma if yer gonna repeat it..... I've got a coupla Japanese planes, and if I was sufficiently bent, I'd calculate the mass, factor in the gravity, calculate the force required to shear the width of the softest wood and see if it works. My common sense says it wouldn't. Hmm, wouldn't that be a good little project. So, I'm bent. but I ain't no physicist (unlike some other galoots on the other side of the world) And it was. The hypothesis. A japanese plane, when placed on an inclined board, will produce a gossamer shaving when the angle of inclination is right the methodology I took my lightest japanese plane (sorry folks, too heavy for the triple beam balanc so the physics analysis is outta the question ) hooked it on the end of a piece of oak and started cutting. I measured the thickness of the shaving. .008" (that translates to 125 strokes to the inch, a reasonably fine shaving for a "charpentier" or an ebeniste, unless I'm really off base. Once I had started to cut a shaving, I stopped. Then I started rotating the board (only 1/4" of surface was being planed). The observations...... It hit a 45 degree incline. the plane didn't move it hit 90 degrees, the plane didn't move it hit 135 degrees, the plane is now upside down, and still didn't move at about 150 degrees, the plane fell off the board. ( I did catch it). It was damn near totally upside down. Well I guess iffen it was a bailey #7 or 8, the weight mighta made it fall off at around the 90 degree mark, but I ain't even gonna try that. My conclusions: 1. my test was so flawed that the results are nonsensical. I didn't know what I was doing (which may be true!!!) 2. there was a gravatational anomoly that precluded accurate results, and the tests should be repeated. (In short a class 1 statistical error) 3. My planes, which are used in trade practices, are not representative of typical japanese planes. Shikonuns would turn over in their graves if only they knew that an unwashed heathen-christian was strokin their irons.... 4. my edges are nowhere sharp enuf and I should sharpen them between each stroke, which I didn't- I freely and shamefully admit. 5. the wood I was using (quercas rubris) was possibly from a previosuly unreported hypoer-adhesive sub-variant and was in it's super-adherent mode at the time of the tests. 6. some of the Plane lore is incorrect, and further studies must be done. Send me lots of money and I'll gladly do em..... 7. This experiment reveals that HC is indeed a mathematic subset of WWLLUM, and although it fails to exactly define the algebraic/arithmetic/geometric relationship precisely, indicates strongly that there is some relationship of shaving gossamerity to the angle of the dangle which seems to vary with the sphinterostasis associated with same....... Cowtown Eric disclaimer: this was all in fun. Anyone who takes it seriously is well advised to search out the "church of the sub-genius" and pay particular attention to the phraseology: "F...-em if they can't take a joke" a phrase attributed my many to Bob. | |||
| Related Messages | |||
| ID | From | Date | Subject |
| 63776 | Eric Coyle <ecoyle@c...> | Jun-10-1999 | The inclined plane.... |
| 63778 | "Nuno Souto" <nsouto@n...> | Jun-10-1999 | Re: The inclined plane.... |
| 63785 | Phil and Debbie Koontz <pdknz@j. | Jun-10-1999 | Re: The inclined plane.... |
| 63791 | Johnny Johnson <jjohnso4@b...> | Jun-10-1999 | Re: The inclined plane.... |
| 63851 | Howard Slack <hnslack@i...> | Jun-11-1999 | Re: The inclined plane.... |
| 63856 | Nichael Lynn Cramer <nichael@s.. | Jun-11-1999 | Re: The inclined plane.... |
| 63882 | Eric Coyle <ecoyle@c...> | Jun-11-1999 | Re: The inclined plane.... |
Browse from Here (63776)
back (63775)
up (browse index)
forward (63777)
Get entire thread
New Search
New Advanced Search
New Browse Form
Browse Recent Messages