The following shows the message you requested. To get back to the list of browse results, click the back button on your browser.
If you are thinking of subscribing to this list, please consult the OldTools FAQ.
| 46027 | TomPrice@a... | Jul-07-1998 | Re: Calculating the Angle of the Slippery Slope |
Bill wrote: >I've begun purchasing things in my travels and then when I get home.... >I SNEAK THEM INTO THE HOUSE. > >There - I've said it. Whew - feels kinda good to get that out. I >actually check to make sure that she's occupied with the baby and then >quietly slip down to "get something from the car", and quickly (with >furtive glances at the window to be sure she's not watching) grab >whatever rusty/greasy/old/heavy/cast iron/steel/wood item(s) are in the >trunk/floor of the car and run in that funny scurrying way that you have >to when you're carrying something heavy that you don't want anyone to >see, and you don't want the sawdust/grease/rust to get on your clothes. >(Worse than lipstick on your collar, if'n ya know what I mean). I applaud your willingness to share this with us. We here at the Support Group From Hell are ready to listen and offer support at any time. The only problem with such posts is that they are inevitably followed by smug declarations from Galoots who announce that their SWMBO's are perfectly OK with an increasing stream of rusty objects flowing down the basement stairs. Puh-leeaase (finger down throat and gagging). The time honored tradition of leaving tools in the car to 'age' a bit has long been practiced by Galoots. It is well known that the environment in a closed vehicle allows the process of patination to proceed at an accelerated pace. Likewise, the 'sneaking in' of old tools can also be viewed as a Galoot simply being considerate of a rust-averse SWMBO or SO. I mean, it's not like you are going to take it back to the flea market after its been 'aging' in the car for a few days. Nope, the article is irrevocably yours and it's up to you to get this object down to the basement with the least disturbance of the household karma. We just have to face the fact that not everyone has the same fascination with well oxidized metal/wood objects that we do. 'Sneaking in' has sort of a guilty/furtive overtone which I dislike. I prefer the term 'rust ensconcement' which I believe adequately describes the same process but in a more neutral and obscure fashion. Just in case you are discovered in the act and asked what you are doing. >Said item(s) then get quickly and quietly as possible deposited in the >shop somewhere, usually in several somewheres - it's not a good idea to >have them all appear in the same spot at the same time. If she does >notice one or two at a later date (which, so far, she has not), then >it's "What - that? No, I've had that for a while - it's been there for a >long time. You didn't notice it before? Oh." Ok, this is where chaos and a cluttered shop can work for you. The old Zen koan. "If a tool appears in the basement and SWMBO did not see it in transfer, then was it not always there?" is admittedly my favorite. I also like the term 'hide in plain sight' which says so much with so few words. The more your shop approaches a fractal pattern the less concerned you have to be with a single tool being recognized in the overall scheme of things. Of course you are not really trying to hide anything because this would be dishonest. Everything is right out in the open. The fact that SWMBO would need Salaman's tool dictionary and Walter's guide and several other reference works, as well as several hours to make sense of it all, is beside the point. OTOH, the more devious SWMBO could keep track simply by marking your tools with one of those markers that only shows up under a black-light. Periodic shop tours with the light would quickly show the ratio of marked vs non-marked tools. Now that I mention it, I have seen a black light in the basement... **************************** Tom Price (TomPrice@a...) Rust Ensconcement A Specialty The Galoots Progress: http://members.aol.com/tomprice/galootp/galtprog.html | |||
| Related Messages | |||
| ID | From | Date | Subject |
| 45855 | Patrick Olguin <Odeen@c...> | Jul-03-1998 | Calculating the Angle of the Slippery Slope |
| 45856 | buzzmk <buzzmk@f...> | Jul-03-1998 | Re: Calculating the Angle of the Slippery Slope |
| 45859 | JF1616@a... | Jul-03-1998 | Re: Calculating the Angle of the Slippery Slope |
| 45860 | "Stephan Patnaude" <spatnaude@i. | Jul-03-1998 | Re: Calculating the Angle of the Slippery Slope |
| 45869 | eoh@k... (Esther Heller) | Jul-03-1998 | Re: Calculating the Angle of the Slippery Slope |
| 45898 | ernfisch@p... | Jul-04-1998 | Re: Calculating the Angle of the Slippery Slope |
| 45902 | Tom Holloway <thh1@c...> | Jul-05-1998 | Re: Calculating the Angle of the Slippery Slope |
| 45903 | "William K. Taggart" <wkt@i...> | Jul-05-1998 | Re: Calculating the Angle of the Slippery Slope |
| 45913 | Jack Kamishlian <KamishlianJ@p.. | Jul-05-1998 | Re: Calculating the Angle of the Slippery Slope |
| 46027 | TomPrice@a... | Jul-07-1998 | Re: Calculating the Angle of the Slippery Slope |
| 46061 | Pierre Fogal <pfogal@d...> | Jul-07-1998 | Re: Calculating the Angle of the Slippery Slope |
| 46069 | ElZopilote@a... | Jul-08-1998 | Re: Calculating the Angle of the Slippery Slope |
Browse from Here (46027)
back (46026)
up (browse index)
forward (46028)
Get entire thread
New Search
New Advanced Search
New Browse Form
Browse Recent Messages