OldTools Archive

Recent Bios FAQ

230998 Jon Hammer <hammej1@g...> 2012‑03‑14 Re: A Stanley 62 rule
I have a 62 and find the scales and the ways that they change vexing. I
tend to take serial measurements using different scales without noticing
the changes. Why were they made this way? Thanks, Jon Hammer

Sent from my iPod

On Jun 11, 2012, at 9:42 PM, "Adam R. Maxwell"  wrote:

>> On Jun 11, 2012, at 11:53 , Ron Harper  wrote:
>>> GGs
>>>> I just got one of these off the bay for the pocket of my shop apron
>>>> and it came today. It is laid out in 8ths, 10ths, 12ths, and 16ths.
>> Huh. I was going to write a post saying you guys were full of it,
> when I noticed that my #62 changes from 12ths to 10ths along the same
> edge. Wonder why that seemed like a good idea??
>> The 66-3/4 rule (brass bound boxwood, 36") is the one I use all the
> time, and it only has 1/8" and 1/16" divisions. The #62 was my first
> folding rule, but I found that I needed extra length too often.
>> Adam
> Port Angeles, WA
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------
> OldTools is a mailing list catering to the interests of hand tool
> aficionados, both collectors and users, to discuss the history, usage,
> value, location, availability, collectibility, and restoration of
> traditional handtools, especially woodworking tools.
>> To change your subscription options:
> http://ruckus.law.cornell.edu/mailman/listinfo/oldtools
>> To read the FAQ:
> http://swingleydev.com/archive/faq.html
>> OldTools archive: http://swingleydev.com/archive/ OldTools@r...
> http://ruckus.law.cornell.edu/mailman/listinfo/oldtools
------------------------------------------------------------------------

230903 Kirk Eppler <eppler.kirk@g...> 2012‑06‑11 Re: A Stanley 62 rule
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Ron Harper  wrote:

>
> > I just got one of these off the bay for the pocket of my shop apron and it c
ame today. It is laid out in 8ths, 10ths, 12ths, and 16ths.
>
> Is this standard for this rule?

According to the 1934 catalog on Rose Antiques, pdf  pg 18 , Yes.

Kirk in HMB, CA
------------------------------------------------------------------------

230901 "Ron Harper" <ron@c...> 2012‑06‑11 A Stanley 62 rule
GGs

I just got one of these off the bay for the pocket of my shop apron and
it came today. It is laid out in 8ths, 10ths, 12ths, and 16ths.

Is this standard for this rule=3F

Ron

--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter. SPAMfighter has removed
11793 of my spam emails to date. Get the free SPAMfighter here:
http://www.spamfighter.com/len

Do you have a slow PC=3F Try Free scan http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-
PCfighter=3Fcid=sigen
------------------------------------------------------------------------

230902 Bill Ghio <bghio@m...> 2012‑06‑11 Re: A Stanley 62 rule
I have a 62 1/2 and a Lufkin 372. Both are marked that way. 

Bill

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 11, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Ron Harper  wrote:

> GGs
> 
> > I just got one of these off the bay for the pocket of my shop apron and it c
ame today. It is laid out in 8ths, 10ths, 12ths, and 16ths.
> 
> Is this standard for this rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------

230904 Ken Shepard <waruba@c...> 2012‑06‑11 Re: A Stanley 62 rule
Yes.

Ken Shepard

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Ron Harper  wrote:

> GGs
>
> I just got one of these off the bay for the pocket of my shop apron and it
> came today. It is laid out in 8ths, 10ths, 12ths, and 16ths.
>
> Is this standard for this rule?
>
> Ron
>
>
>
>
> --
> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
> SPAMfighter has removed 11793 of my spam emails to date.
> Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len
>
> Do you have a slow PC? Try Free scan
> http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> OldTools is a mailing list catering to the interests of hand tool
> aficionados, both collectors and users, to discuss the history, usage,
> value, location, availability, collectibility, and restoration of
> traditional handtools, especially woodworking tools.
>
> To change your subscription options:
> http://ruckus.law.cornell.edu/mailman/listinfo/oldtools
>
> To read the FAQ:
> http://swingleydev.com/archive/faq.html
>
> OldTools archive: http://swingleydev.com/archive/
>
> OldTools@r...
> http://ruckus.law.cornell.edu/mailman/listinfo/oldtools
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------

230912 "Adam R. Maxwell" <amaxwell@m...> 2012‑06‑11 Re: A Stanley 62 rule
On Jun 11, 2012, at 11:53 , Ron Harper  wrote:

> GGs
> 
> > I just got one of these off the bay for the pocket of my shop apron and it c
ame today. It is laid out in 8ths, 10ths, 12ths, and 16ths.

Huh.  I was going to write a post saying you guys were full of it,
when I noticed that my #62 changes from 12ths to 10ths along the
same edge.  Wonder why that seemed like a good idea??

The 66-3/4 rule (brass bound boxwood, 36") is the one I use all the
time, and it only has 1/8" and 1/16" divisions.  The #62 was my
first folding rule, but I found that I needed extra length too often.

Adam
Port Angeles, WA

------------------------------------------------------------------------


Recent Bios FAQ