The following shows the message you requested. To get back to the list of browse results, click the back button on your browser.
If you are thinking of subscribing to this list, please consult the OldTools FAQ.
| 128326 | Andrew Midkiff <annarborandrew@y | Jan-27-2004 | RE: Experimenting with augurs |
--- Thomas Conroy <booktoolcutter@y...> wrote: > Galoots: > With a big bit, having a > coarse lead screw > means it takes a lot more force to turn the brace; > putting a 1 1/4" > hole through hard maple, or even cherry, with a > coarse bit is a > pain, Now, that I can understand. I did my experiment with a tiny #4 (1/4") bit so I didn't have that problem. > I had always assumed that the fine screw would pull > the bit through > faster, but today I put two 1" and two 1 1/4" holes > through 1 3/4" > teak, and counted the turns. They both took 25-30 > turns for the lead > screw to stick out of the other side although the > bigger bit looked > to have one turn in the lead screw for every turn in > the lead screw > of the smaller bit. Don't have an explanation for > this one, and it > doesn't accord with my memory of previous > experience. > So, are you saying that you used one course and one fine of each size and they took the same number of turns? When I tried it with my #4, the fine thread took 90 turns to go as deep as the other did in 25 or so turns. (can't remember the exact numbers this morning) So, to sum up, so far it seems that with large bits a fine thread might help make the boring easier as you're not trying to hog out a lot of wood with each turn, but still no reason to use fine threads on the smaller bits. AAAndrew Slipping and sliding away in Durham, North Carolina __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ | |||
| Related Messages | |||
| ID | From | Date | Subject |
| 127978 | Andrew Midkiff <annarborandrew@y | Jan-21-2004 | Experimenting with augurs |
| 128241 | "John Sawchak" <jherbs@e...> | Jan-26-2004 | RE: Experimenting with augurs |
| 128255 | Andrew Midkiff <annarborandrew@y | Jan-26-2004 | RE: Experimenting with augurs |
| 128301 | Thomas Conroy <booktoolcutter@y. | Jan-26-2004 | RE: Experimenting with augurs |
| 128326 | Andrew Midkiff <annarborandrew@y | Jan-27-2004 | RE: Experimenting with augurs |
| 128374 | Thomas Conroy <booktoolcutter@y. | Jan-27-2004 | RE: Experimenting with augurs |
| 128434 | Thomas Conroy <booktoolcutter@y. | Jan-28-2004 | Re: Experimenting with augurs |
Browse from Here (128326)
back (128325)
up (browse index)
forward (128327)
Get entire thread
New Search
New Advanced Search
New Browse Form
Browse Recent Messages